HOFFA

v.

GRAY, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Lansdown, 460 F.2d 164 (4th Cir. 1972)
  …to dismiss an indictment is not a final order, but an unappealable interlocutory one. See United States v. Curry, 442 F. 2d 428 (4 Cir. 1971); United States v. Garber, 413 F. 2d 284 (2 Cir. 1969); Hoffa v. Gray, 323 F. 2d 178 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 907, 84 S.Ct. 199, 11 L.Ed.2d 147 (1963). The policy to limit appeals to those taken from final orders is particularly strong in criminal cases where “delays and disruptions attendant upon intermediate appeal are especially inimical to the effective a…
• United States v. United States Dist. Court FOR the E. Dist. OF Mich., 444 F.2d 651 (6th Cir. 1971)
  …, 30-31, 63 S.Ct. 938, 87 L.Ed. 1185 (1943); Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland, 346 U.S. 379, 382, 74 S.Ct. 145, 98 L.Ed. 106 (1953); Black v. Boyd, 248 F. 2d 156, 159 (6th Cir. 1957); Hoffa v. Gray, 323 F. 2d 178, 179 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 907, 84 S.Ct. 199, 11 L.Ed.2d 147 (1963); University National Stockholders Protective Comm., Inc. v. University National Life Ins. Co., 328 F. 2d 425, 426 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 933, 84 S.Ct. 1335, 12 L.Ed.2d 296 (1964). Petitioner United S…
• United States v. Honorable Frank J. Battisti, 486 F.2d 961 (6th Cir. 1973)
  …ed in the present proceeding depends on whether the order here under attack is an appealable order. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for an appeal when an appeal is the proper procedure. Hoffa v. Gray, 323 F. 2d 178 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 375 U.S. 907, 84 S.Ct. 199, 11 L.Ed.2d 147 (1963). The attorneys for Judge Battisti argue that such an order is appealable under 18 U.S.C. § 3731. No authority, other than the literal wording of the statute, is cited to support this position. The Government, o…