ANDREWS

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (U.S. 1994)
  …rary notwithstanding, the Government’s position, “[accurately identified,” post, at 632, is precisely that “guns in general” are dangerous items. The. Government, like the dissent, cites Sipes v. United States, 321 F. 2d 174,179 (CA8), cert. denied, 375 U. S. 913 (1963), for the proposition that a defendant’s knowledge that the item he possessed “was a gun” is sufficient for a conviction under § 5861(d). Brief for United States 21. Indeed, the Government argues that “guns” should be placed in the same catego…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Herbert, 698 F.2d 981 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …ion.” See United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (hand grenades); Thomas, 531 F. 2d 419 (short barrel rifle); De Bartolo, 482 F. 2d 312 (sawed-off shotgun); Sipes v. United States, 321 F. 2d 174 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 913, 84 S.Ct. 208, 11 L.Ed.2d 150 (1963) (short barrel rifle, externally modified). The Supreme Court, in discussing the scienter requirement in a similar statutory scheme, stated that Pencils, dental floss, paper clips may also be regulated. But they…
• Marshall v. United States, 422 F.2d 185 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …provisions which applied thereto were complied with. . See Haynes v. United States, 1968, 390 U.S. 85, 90-95, 88 S.Ct. 722, 19 L.Ed.2d 923, 928-931. . For pr e-Haynes decisions see Sipes v. United States, 8 Cir. 1963, 321 F. 2d 174, cert. denied, 375 U.S. 913, 84 S.Ct. 208, 11 L.Ed.2d 150; Mares v. United States, 10 Cir. 1963, 319 F. 2d 71. . See Burton v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 414 F. 2d 261; Lewis v. United States, 10 Cir. 1969, 408 F. 2d 1310; Reed v. United States, 8 Cir. 1968, 401 F. 2d 756, 7…