BUCK

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Herbert, 698 F.2d 981 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …ion.” See United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (hand grenades); Thomas, 531 F. 2d 419 (short barrel rifle); De Bartolo, 482 F. 2d 312 (sawed-off shotgun); Sipes v. United States, 321 F. 2d 174 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 913, 84 S.Ct. 208, 11 L.Ed.2d 150 (1963) (short barrel rifle, externally modified). The Supreme Court, in discussing the scienter requirement in a similar statutory scheme, stated that Pencils, dental floss, paper clips may also be regulated. But they…
• United States v. Pacelli, 491 F.2d 1108 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …See Posadas v. National City Bank, 296 [*1114] U.S. 497, 503, 56 S.Ct. 349, 80 L.Ed. 351 (1936). No such showing is made here. This is not a case like that cited to us by appellant, United States v. Lovely, 319 F. 2d 673 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 913, 84 S.Ct. 210, 11 L.Ed.2d 151 (1963), where both laws covered identical subject matter: South Carolina’s consent to the acquisition of its land by the United States for any public purpose and the procedures to be followed for the vesting of jurisdic…
• The United States v. Anderson, 885 F.2d 1248 (5th Cir. 1989)
  …make it more difficult for the gangster element to obtain certain types of firearms.” Sipes v. United States, 321 F. 2d 174, 176 (8th Cir.) (quoting the legislative history) (cited in Freed, 401 U.S. at 607, 91 S.Ct. at 1117), cert. [*1262] denied, 375 U.S. 913, 84 S.Ct. 208, 11 L.Ed.2d 150 (1963). . The Supreme Court has long acknowledged a difference in its attitude toward precedent where it is presented with a constitutional question rather than one of statutory interpretation. Justice Brandéis, in his…

  ← 1 / 2 →