LEVINE
v.
LACY
Mr. Justice Black would grant certiorari to consider the two following questions presented by petitioner which challenge the validity under the Federal Constitution and laws of a $9,000 default judgment rendered against him by a Virginia state court in a tort case involving an automobile accident:
(1) Whether entry of the default judgment while petitioner's answer and cross-claim — which had been filed in the United States District Court as authorized by 81 (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure — were pending, amounted under the circumstances to a denial of due process of law.
(2) Whether Virginia denied petitioner the kind of notice due process requires in rendering the judgment by default against him without giving him any notice at all to enable him to contest the judgment or its amount, despite the fact that he then had pending and undisposed of an answer and cross-bill, which had been filed months before the judgment by default was entered against him.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
White v. United States, 394 F.2d 49 (9th Cir. 1968)…hite * * * and * * * Lewis * * * conspired * * * knowingly to import * * * narcotic drugs into the United States * * * in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 173,” is clearly sufficient.1 Palomino v. United States, 318 F. 2d 613 (9th Cir., 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 932, 84 S.Ct. 335, 11 L.Ed.2d 264 (1963). See also Tenorio v. United States, 390 F. 2d 96 (9th Cir., 1968); Olar v. United States, 391 F. 2d 773 (9th Cir., 1968). Appellants’ second and third points may be treated together as they both deal with eviden…
-
United States v. Spada, 331 F.2d 995 (2d Cir. 1964)…S.Ct. 491, 11 L.Ed.2d 418, and an indictment not questioned at trial or on direct appeal will be upheld unless so defective as to obviously fail to set forth the offense charged. Palomino v. United States, 9 Cir., 318 F. 2d 613, cert. denied, 1963, 375 U.S. 932, 84 S.Ct. 335, 11 L.Ed.2d 264. Here [*997] the indictment clearly states the essential elements of the crimes, the dates when they were perpetrated and the fact that they occurred within the Southern District of New York. The names of the buyers nee…
-
United States v. Serge Christian Hysohion, 448 F.2d 343 (2d Cir. 1971)…o United States v. Puco, 436 F. 2d 761, 762-763 (2 Cir. 1971); United States v. Febre, 425 F. 2d 107, 112 (2 Cir.), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 839, 91 S.Ct. 40, 27 L. Ed.2d 87 (1970); Palomino v. United States, 318 F. 2d 613, 615 (9 Cir.), cert, denied, 375 U.S. 932, 84 S.Ct. 335, 11 L. Ed.2d 264 (1963); Hernandez v. United States, 300 F. 2d 114, 120 (9 Cir. 1962). The record before us discloses no direct proof, and no inferential proof from the fact of Roupinian’s possession, that either Rimbaud or Hysohion k…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence