ORMENTO
v.
UNITED STATES; DI PIETRO V. UNITED STATES; FERNANDEZ V. UNITED STATES; PANICO V. UNITED STATES; GALANTE V. UNITED STATES; LOICANO V. UNITED STATES; MANCINO V. UNITED STATES; SCIREMAMMANO V. UNITED STATES; AND MIRRA V. UNITED STATES
ORMENTO
UNITED STATES; DI PIETRO V. UNITED STATES; FERNANDEZ V. UNITED STATES; PANICO V. UNITED STATES; GALANTE V. UNITED STATES; LOICANO V. UNITED STATES; MANCINO V. UNITED STATES; SCIREMAMMANO V. UNITED STATES; AND MIRRA V. UNITED STATES
375 U.S. 940
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Caution
Cited by 98 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (94 total)
-
Cappetta v. State, 204 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)…a defendant in a criminal case to act as his own lawyer is unqualified if invoked prior to the start of the trial. United States v. Plattner, supra; United States v. Bentvena, 2 Cir. 1963, 319 F. 2d 916, 938, cert. denied, Ormento v. United States, 375 U.S. 940, 84 S.Ct. 345, 11 L.Ed.2d 271; United States v. Dennis, 2 Cir. 1950, 183 F. 2d 201, 234, aff’d, 341 U.S. 494, 71 S.Ct. 857, 95 L.Ed. 1137. Some courts consider this right so basic as to allow a prisoner to argue his own defense in a sanity hearing w…
-
United States v. Borelli, 336 F.2d 376 (2d Cir. 1964)…denied [Ormento v. United States, Di Pietro v. United States, Fernandez v. United States, Panico v. United States, Galante v. United States, Loicano v. United States, Mancino v. United States, Sciremammano v. United States, Mirra v. United States], 375 U.S. 940, 84 S.Ct. 345, 346, 353, 355, 360, 11 L.Ed.2d 271, 272 (1963) ; rehearing denied, Fernandez v. United States, 375 U.S. 989, 84 S.Ct. 515, 11 L.Ed.2d 476; and that the instruction was sufficient, at least in the absence of a request containing a bett…1 / 2
-
United States v. Carmine Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087 (2d Cir. 1975)…ential of conflicting interests. . Nor are we willing to accept appellant’s position that a two-week continuance would have been an appropriate length of time for a continuance. United States v. Bentvena, 319 F. 2d 916, 934 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 940, 84 S.Ct. 345, 11 L.Ed.2d 271 (1963). . On this basis it is unnecessary for us to consider the prejudicial effect of Salley’s first counsel’s having told the jury in opening argument that he (Salley) would take the stand, while his second attorney…
Previewing 3 of 94 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence