UNITED STATES

v.

MARYLAND FOR THE USE OF MEYER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (57 total)

• Univs. Research Assn., Inc. v. Coutu, 450 U.S. 754 (U.S. 1981)
  …Christian & Associates v. United States, 160 Ct. Cl. 1, 11-17, 312 F. 2d 418, 424-427 (termination-for-convenience clause incorporated in contract by operation of law), reargument denied, 160 Ct. Cl. 58, 60-67, 320 F. 2d 345, 347-351, cert. denied, 375 U. S. 954 (1963), is misplaced, since the Act is not self-implementing. See Thieblot, at 26-27, 64-67, 143-146; Donahue, The Davis-Bacon Act and the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act: A Comparison of Coverage and Minimum Wage Provisions, 29 Law & Contemp. Pr…
• M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Seamans, 455 F.2d 1289 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …ncorporated into the contract by operation of law since it is required by ASPR and this requirement has the force and effect of law. G. L. Christian and Assoc, v. United States, 312 F. 2d 418, 160 Ct.Cl. 1; 320 F. 2d 345, 160 Ct.Cl. 58, cert. denied 375 U.S. 954, 84 S.Ct. 444, 11 L. Ed.2d 314 (1963). The termination-for-convenience clause “lodge[s] in the contracting officer the fullest of discretion to end the work ‘in the best interests of the Government.’ ” Nolan Bros., Inc. v. United States, 405 F. 2d 1…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Maryland v. United States, 381 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1965)
  …in the District Court for the District of Columbia, and recovered judgments. The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed, United States v. Maryland for the use of Meyer, 116 U. S. App. D. C. 259, 322 F. 2d 1009, cert. denied, 375 U. S. 954, motion for leave to file petition for rehearing pending, No. 543, 1963 Term. Meanwhile, petitioners filed a similar suit in the Western District of Pennsylvania, and all parties agreed to proceed solely on the record made in the Meyer case. The Dis…