LATHAM ET AL.

v.

CROUSE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Hall v. United States, 410 F.2d 653 (4th Cir. 1969)
  …harge an offense under the kidnapping statute, by reason of omission of the words “and held.” Accord, Waley v. United States, 178 F. 2d 311 (9th Cir. 1949) ; Burns v. United States, 210. F.Supp. 528 (W.D.Mo.1962), aff’d, 321 F. 2d 893, cert. denied, 375 U.S. 959, 84 S.Ct. 448, 11 L.Ed.2d 317 (1963); cf. United States v. Martell, 335 F. 2d 764 (4th Cir. 1964). Chatwin v. United States, 326 U.S. 455, 66 S.Ct. 233, 90 L.Ed. 198 (1946), is not controlling here. The Supreme Court there considered convictions se…
• Hickock v. Crouse, 334 F.2d 95 (10th Cir. 1964)
  …and jury or an information filed formally charging the accused. It does not include representation at a preliminary hearing. State of Utah v. Sullivan, 10 Cir., 227 F. 2d 511; Latham v. Crouse and York v. Crouse, 10 Cir., 320 F. 2d 120, cert. denied 375 U.S. 959, 84 S.Ct. 449, 11 L.Ed.2d 317. . In Frand v. United States, 10 Cir., 301 F. 2d 102, 103, this court said: “Lack of effective assistance of counsel in the trial of a criminal case constitutes impingement upon a constitutional right of tile accused a…
• Johnson v. United States, 333 F.2d 371 (10th Cir. 1964)
  …not called upon to waive assistance of counsel or any other constitutional right. He cannot, therefore, complain of the deprivation of any constitutional right at this stage of the proceedings. Cf. Latham v. Crouse (10 CA), 320 F. 2d 120, cert. den. 375 U.S. 959, 84 S.Ct. 449, 11 L.Ed.2d 317; and Marshall v. United States (10 CA), 321 F. 2d 897. The appellant was represented by retained counsel at a sanity hearing, pursuant to which he was adjudged competent to stand trial and assist in his defense. He was…