FERGUSON ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1985)
  …. 20, 23 (1976) (per curiam); Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U. S. 1, 11 (1970); Foster v. California, 394 U. S. 440, 444 (1969); Gilbert v. California, 388 U. S. 263, 274 (1967); United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218, 242 (1967); Ferguson v. United States, 375 U. S. 962 (1964) (order). See also Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U. S. 73,102 (1983) (Powell, J., dissenting) (question of an error’s possible prejudice is “[njormally... a question more appropriately left to the courts below,” in part because “[t]here may be f…
• Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp., 379 U.S. 148 (U.S. 1964)
  …erits did not prejudice respondent in any way, because it sustained respondent’s contentions by denying the petition for mandamus and affirming the District Court’s order.7 321 F. 2d 518. Petitioner brought the case here, and we granted certio-rari. 375 U. S. 962. I. In this.Court respondent joins petitioner in urging us to hold that 28 U. S. C. § 1291 (1958 ed.) does not require us to dismiss this case and that we can and should decide the validity of the. District Court’s order to strike. We agrée. Unde…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 (U.S. 1965)
  …t1 by locking out their regular employees and using temporary replacements to carry on business. 137 N. L. R. B. 73. The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit disagreed and refused to enforce the Board’s order. 319 F. 2d 7. We granted certiorari, 375 U. S. 962. We affirm the Court of Appeals. Five operators of six retail food stores in Carlsbad, New Mexico, make up the employer group. The stores had bargained successfully on a group basis for many years with Local 462 of the Retail Clerks International…