ROSS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Polizzi, 500 F.2d 856 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …ions sufficiently alerted the jury to the caution necessary in weighing the testimony of a witness like Friedman. Cf. United States v. Evanchik, 413 F. 2d 950, 954 (2 Cir. 1969); United States v. Ross, 322 F. 2d 306, 307 (4 Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 970, 84 S.Ct. 490, 11 L.Ed.2d 418 (1964). I. Skimming35 Appellants argue that the trial court committed error in not admonishing the jury during instructions that the prosecution’s argument about “skimming” should be disregarded as unsupported by evid…
• United States v. Burnell G. Watson, 623 F.2d 1198 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …v. Polizzi, 500 F. 2d 856, 878 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1120, 95 S.Ct. 802, 42 L.Ed.2d 820 (1975); United States v. Evanchik, 413 F. 2d 950, 954 (2d Cir. 1969); United States v. Ross, 322 F. 2d 306, 307 (4th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 970, 84 S.Ct. 490, 11 L.Ed.2d 418 (1964). The failure to grant defendant’s requested instruction on perjury is not plain error. The last two instructions which Watson contends should have been included in the court’s charge concern the element of knowle…
• Am. Home Prods. Corp. v. Lockwood Mfg. Co., 483 F.2d 1120 (6th Cir. 1973)
  …second is a derivative of the first in that the pan is the end result of the process. These patents are fully discussed in two opinions of the Seventh Circuit, Ekco Products v. Chicago Metallic Mfg. Co., 321 F. 2d 550 (7th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 970, 84 S.Ct. 490, 11 L.Ed.2d 418 (1964), and 347 F. 2d 453 (7th Cir. 1965), and in the opinion of the District Court, 173 U.S. P.Q. 486 (S.D.Ohio 1972), and the technical details need not be repeated here. I LACHES The record discloses that there ar…

  ← 1 / 3 →