HONEYWOOD ET AL.

v.

ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Wells v. Rockefeller, 394 U.S. 542 (U.S. 1969)
  …y election was only three months away on March 20, we cannot say that there was error in permitting the 1968 election to proceed under the plan despite its constitutional infirmities. See Kilgarlin v. Hill, 386 U. S. 120, 121 (1967); Martin v. Bush, 376 U. S. 222, 223 (1964); Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 390 U. S. 939 (1968). But ample time remains to promulgate a plan meeting constitutional standards before the election machinery must be set in motion for the 1970 election. We therefore reverse the judgment of…
• Mrs. Fannie Lou Hamer v. Campbell, 358 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …sible to raise in their noncash economy.” . H.R.Rep.No.439, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. (1965) [U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News, p. 2452]. . Bor cases where elections have been enjoined, see, e. g., Bush v. Martin, 1963, S.D.Tex., 224 F.Supp. 499, aff'd, 1964, 376 U.S. 222, 84 S.Ct. 709, 11 L.Ed.2d 656; Calkins v. Hare, E.D.Mich., 1964, 228 F.Supp. 824; Ellis v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, D.Md., 1964, 234 F.Supp. 945. . Reynolds v. Sims, 1964, 377 U.S. 533, 585, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1393, 12 L.Ed.2d 506, 541. .…
• Rockefeller v. Wells, 389 U.S. 421 (U.S. 1967)
  …Supp. 953, said specifically that “population and population alone is the sole standard for congressional [*423] representation.” Id., at 973. This Court affirmed without opinion. 385 U. S. 450. See also Bush v. Martin, 224 F. Supp. 499, 511, aff'd, 376 U. S. 222. The New York Legislature, for example, made careful efforts to comply with the constitutional requirements, as they had been enunciated by this Court. The Joint Legislative Committee on Reapportionment thus expressly recognized “the absence of Fed…