MARTIN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL.
v.
BUSH ET AL.

U.S. | 1964-03-02
No. 675
Mr. Justice Clark joins this disposition, but upon the grounds stated in his separate opinion in Wesberry v. Sanders, ante, p. 18., Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart would reverse the judgment below for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Wesberry v. Sanders, ante, pp. 20, 50.
376 U.S. 222 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 84 S. Ct. 709 · 11 L. Ed. 2d 656 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1704 · SCDB 1963-061
Cited by 6 cases
Topics
Equitable Relief

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Equitable Relief cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.

[*223] Pee Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed on the authority of Wesberry v. Sanders, ante, p. 1, without prejudice to the right of the appellants to apply by April 1, 1964, to the District Court for further equitable relief in light of the present circumstances including the imminence of the forthcoming election and “the operation of the election machinery of Texas” noted by the District Court in its opinion.* The stay heretofore granted by Mr. Justice Black is continued in effect pending timely application for the foregoing relief and final disposition thereof by the District Court.

Mr. Justice Clark joins this disposition, but upon the grounds stated in his separate opinion in Wesberry v. Sanders, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart would reverse the judgment below for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Wesberry v. Sanders, ante, pp. 20, 50.

*

224 F. Supp. 499, 513.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Mrs. Fannie Lou Hamer v. Campbell, 358 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1966)
    …in their noncash economy.” . H.R.Rep.No.439, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. (1965) [U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News, p. 2452]. . Bor cases where elections have been enjoined, see, e. g., Bush v. Martin, 1963, S.D.Tex., 224 F.Supp. 499, aff'd, 1964, 376 U.S. 222, 84 S.Ct. 709, 11 L.Ed.2d 656; Calkins v. Hare, E.D.Mich., 1964, 228 F.Supp. 824; Ellis v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, D.Md., 1964, 234 F.Supp. 945. . Reynolds v. Sims, 1964, 377 U.S. 533, 585, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1393, 12 L.Ed.2d 506, 541. . In denying the…
  • Chapman v. Pub. Util. Dist. NO. 1 OF Douglas Cnty., 367 F.2d 163 (9th Cir. 1966)
    …Land, 281 F. 2d 271, 274 (8th Cir. 1960); State of Washington Department of Game v. FPC, 207 F. 2d 391, 395-396 (9th Cir. 1953); United States v. State of Montana, 134 F. 2d 194, 197 (9th Cir. 1943). See also City of Seattle v. Beezer, 376 U.S. 224, 84 S.Ct. 709, 11 L.Ed.2d 656 (1964); City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers, 357 U.S. 320, 339-340, 78 S.Ct. 1209, 2 L.Ed.2d 1345 (1958). Cf. First Iowa Hydro Elec. Co-op v. FPC, 328 U.S. 152, 165-167, 66 S.Ct. 906, 90 L.Ed. 1143 (1946); Kohl v. United States, 91 U.S. 367,…
  • City OF Seattle v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 923 F.2d 713 (9th Cir. 1991)
    …eattle’s rights, but it was ultimately unsuccessful in that contest. See Public Util. Dist. No. 1 v. FPC, 308 F. 2d 318 (D.C.Cir.1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 908, 83 S.Ct. 719, 9 L.Ed.2d 716 (1963); see also City of Seattle v. Beezer, 376 U.S. 224, 84 S.Ct. 709, 11 L.Ed.2d 656 (1964). For many years thereafter, PUD did not seek to use the boon given to it by Article 49. However, in 1985 it did seek to draw upon two megawatts of power, and that was provided to it under certain interim agreements. It then o…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw