FAWCETT PUBLICATIONS, INC.,
v.
MORRIS

U.S. | 1964-03-23
No. 57
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted or that the petition for writ of certiorari should be granted.
376 U.S. 513 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted or that the petition for writ of certiorari should be granted.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Burchett v. Bardahl OIL Co. & Nance & Assocs., Ltd., 470 F.2d 793 (10th Cir. 1972)
    …he foreign corporation was engaging in or transacting business in the state. See 18 O.S.A. §§ 1.17 and 1.204a; Sweeney Co. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co., 429 P. 2d 759 (Okl.); Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris, 377 P. 2d 42 (Okl.), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 513, 84 S.Ct. 964, 11 L.Ed.2d 968; and see 12 O.S.A. § 153.1 (regarding method of service).…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw