AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1964-03-23
No. 724
376 U.S. 514 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …inction between “express” and other forms of transport, see, e. g., Railway Express Agency, Inc., Extension — Nashua, N. H., 91 M. C. C. 311, 322, sustained sub nom. Auclair Transportation, Inc. v. United States, 221 F. Supp. 328 (D. Mass.), aff’d, 376 U. S. 514, that the 20% stock acquisition would itself violate § 7 because REA controls 88% and Greyhound 7% of the “express” market. For if appellees REA and Greyhound are correct that, because of the increasing cross-competition among groups carrying [*503]…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw