SUBURBAN TELEPHONE CO.
v.
MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. ET AL.
SUBURBAN TELEPHONE CO.
MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. ET AL.
376 U.S. 648
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Barquet, 262 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1972)…the statutes involved. I must respectfully dissent from the majority view. . Laws of 1868, c. 1637, subc. 3, § 11 (1868). . Laws of 1868, c. 1637, subc. 8, § 9 (1868). . See, e. g., Carter v. State, Fla., 155 So. 2d 787 (1963), appeal dismissed, 376 U.S. 648, 84 S.Ct. 983, 11 L.Ed.2d 980 (1967) ; Weightnovel v. State, 46 Fla. 1, 35 So. 856 (1904) ; Eggart v. State, 40 Fla. 527, 25 So. 144 (1899) ; Urga v. State, 155 Fla. 86, 20 So. 2d 685 (1945) ; Graham v. State, 153 Fla. 807, 16 So. 2d 59 (1944) ; Sin…1 / 2
-
Roundtree v. State, 271 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)…esented with the opportunity of committing a crime or whether the criminal design or intent originated in the minds of the officers who by persuasion induced its commission by the accused. Carter v. State, 155 So. 2d 787 (Fla.1963), appeal dismissed 376 U.S. 648, 84 S.Ct. 983, 11 L.Ed.2d 980. See also Nadell v. State, 229 So. 2d 592 (Fla.App.1969). Under such circumstances the trial court wisely left the question of entrapment for the jury to resolve and I would sustain the trial court’s refusal to grant…