PUBLISHERS' ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY
v.
NEW YORK MAILERS' UNION NUMBER SIX
PUBLISHERS' ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY
NEW YORK MAILERS' UNION NUMBER SIX
376 U.S. 775
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 12 L. Ed. 2d 82 · 84 S. Ct. 1132 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1491 · SCDB 1963-099
Cited by 48 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Upon the respondent’s suggestion of mootness the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals is vacated insofar as it reversed the stay provision of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss as moot that portion of the complaint seeking such a stay.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (22 total)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp., 385 U.S. 421 (U.S. 1967)…rp., 163 F. Supp. 894 (D. C. W. D. La.). Cf. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson, 370 U. S. 195; Publishers’ Assn. v. New York Mailers’ Union, 317 F. 2d 624 (C. A. 2d Cir.), cert. granted, 375 U. S. 901, judgment vacated in part for dismissal as moot, 376 U. S. 775. Whether a state injunction might be similarly barred in suits governed by federal labor law, Teamsters Local v. Lucas Flour Co., 369 U. S. 95, is an [*430] open question. See Charles Dowd Box Co. v. Courtney, 368 U. S. 502, 514, n. 8. Thus, it may…
-
Cinderella Career & Finishing Schs., Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 425 F.2d 583 (D.C. Cir. 1970)…clearly wrong.” We cannot say that it was, particularly in view of the consumers’ testimony adduced at the hearing. Giant Food Inc. v. FTC, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 227, 231-232, 322 F. 2d 977, 981-982 (1963), cert. dismissed, 376 U.S. 967, 84 S.Ct. 1121, 12 L.Ed.2d 82 (1964) (emphasis added). From this and other statements of the court in the Giant Food case it is quite clear that the use of the words “the Commission” related to the Federal Trade Commission, not to the Federal Trade Commissioners sitting in revie…
-
Alcoa S.S. Co., Inc. v. M/V Nordic Regent, 654 F.2d 147 (2d Cir. 1978)…ants for courts to make this factual determination on a case-by-case, country-by-country basis. See Menendez Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Ins. Co., 311 F. 2d 429, 433 (5th Cir. 1962), judgment vacated on other grounds, 376 U.S. 779, 84 S.Ct. 1130, 12 L.Ed.2d 82 (1964). Pending the millennium, it is better, we think, to adhere to the traditional doctrine that, in the absence of unusually extreme circumstances and manifest injustice, the American plaintiffs choice of his home forum should not be disturbed.…
Previewing 3 of 22 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence