TELEPHONE NEWS SYSTEM, INC.,

v.

ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Sellers, 483 F.2d 37 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …of receiving. For this proposition he cites United States v. Stonehouse, 452 F. 2d 455 (7th Cir. 1971), and Telephone News Systems, Inc. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., 220 F.Supp. 621 (N. D. Ill.1963) (three judge court) (dicta), aff’d per curiam, 376 U.S. 782, 84 S.Ct. 1134, 12 L.Ed.2d 83 (1964), both of which lend some support to his contention. In Sagansky v. United States, 358 F. 2d 195, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 816, 87 S.Ct. 36, 17 L.Ed.2d 55 (1966), however the First Circuit reached a contrary result.…
• United States v. Cerone, 452 F.2d 274 (7th Cir. 1971)
  …erminated pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1084(d) violated his fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. As clearly held in Telephone News Sys., Inc. v. Illinois Bell Tel. Co., 220 F.Supp. 621, 628 (N.D.Ill.1963) (three-judge court), aff’d mem., 376 U.S. 782, 84 S.Ct. 1134, 12 L.Ed.2d 83 (1964), the Government has the burden of proving the propriety of termination in a suit brought to compel the reinstatement of telephone service terminated pursuant to section 1084(d). As the court there said regarding…
• L.O. Ward v. Coleman, 598 F.2d 1187 (10th Cir. 1979)
  …aim in providing the sanction was to punish the individual for engaging in the activity involved or to regulate the activity in question.” Telephone News-System, Inc. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company, 220 F.Supp. 621, 630 (N.D. Ill. 1963), aff’d, 376 U.S. 782, 84 S.Ct. 1134, 12 L.Ed.2d 83 (1964); Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, supra; Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 78 S.Ct. 590, 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958). In undertaking our assessment of the statutory provisions here in question, we must analyze (i) the Congressio…