BRILL

v.

MULLER BROTHERS, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Thurman, 417 F.2d 752 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
  …to an accused if the jury found that he used excessive force to repel the believed danger; and in such a ease he would be guilty of manslaughter only. See, e. g., DeVaughn v. State, 232 Md. 447, 194 A. 2d 109, 100 A.L.R.2d 761 (1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 927, 84 S.Ct. 693, 11 L.Ed.2d 623 (1964). Appellant not only failed to raise any objection to the court’s charge, but it is clear that his retained trial counsel specifically requested and urged the trial court to give the instruction now objected to.…
• United States v. Bennie L. Peterson, 483 F.2d 1222 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …s, supra note 45, 158 U.S. at 559-564, 15 S.Ct. 962; Hutcherson v. State, 165 Ala. 16, 50 So. 1027, 1028 (1909) ; People v. Lewis, 117 Cal. 186, 48 P. 1088, 1090 (1897) ; De Vaughn v. State, 232 Md. 447, 194 A. 2d 109, 112, 113 (1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 927, 84 S.Ct. 693, 11 L.Ed.2d 623 (1964) ; Patten v. People, 18 Mich. 314, 100 Am.Dec. 173, 177-178 (1869) ; Young v. State, 74 Neb. 346, 104 N.W. 867, 869 (1905) ; People v. Tomlins, 213 N.Y. 240, 107 N.E. 496, 497 (1914) ; Commonwealth v. Wilkes, 414…