HUMPHREY ET AL.

v.

MOORE ET AL.; AND GENERAL DRIVERS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 89, V. MOORE ET AL.; LANZA ET AL. V. NEW JERSEY; STICKLER V. OHIO; HARRIS V. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY; CLARK V. WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION; BYRD V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Clark v. State OF Wash., 366 F.2d 678 (9th Cir. 1966)
  …ndations and ordered disbarment, three members of the court dissenting on the limited ground that only a one-year suspension was warranted. In re Clark, 61 Wash.2d 547, 379 P. 2d 354, cert. den., 375 U.S. 986, 84 S.Ct. 519, 11 L.Ed.2d 473, reh. den. 376 U.S. 935, 84 S.Ct. 698, 11 L.Ed.2d 655. Clark then commenced this federal court suit against the State of Washington and the Bar Association, invoking district court jurisdiction under the Civil Rights Act, Rev.Stat. § 1979 (1875), 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1964),…
• Balowski v. Int'l Union, 372 F.2d 829 (6th Cir. 1967)
  …tion on the not so frivolous disputes. * * To remove or gag the union in these cases would surely weaken the collective bargaining and grievance process.” Humphrey v. Moore, 375 U.S. 335, 349-350, 84 S.Ct. 363, 372, 11 L.Ed.2d 370, rehearing denied, 376 U.S. 935, 84 S.Ct. 697, 11 L.Ed.2d 655. Similarly this court has held: “ * * * that the collective bargaining power of the union was not exhausted upon the execution of the collective bargaining contract, that considering the statutory authority of the uni…
• Doctor v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 540 F.2d 699 (4th Cir. 1976)
  …l in the initial collective bargaining procedures, to appeal the decision against him and it should be considered as such in determining class certification. See Humphrey v. Moore (1964) 375 U.S. 335, 342-3, 84 S.Ct. 363, 11 L.Ed.2d 370, reh. denied 376 U.S. 935, 84 S.Ct. 697, 11 L.Ed.2d 665 (1964); Vaca v. Sipes (1967) 386 U.S. 171, 190-3, 87 S.Ct. 903, 17 L.Ed.2d 842. Rule 23(a) sets forth the “mandatory requirements”18 that must be satisfied for the maintenance by a plaintiff of a class action;19 and, w…