SOUTHERN PILOTS ASSOCIATION ET AL.
v.
CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD ET AL.
SOUTHERN PILOTS ASSOCIATION ET AL.
CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD ET AL.
376 U.S. 954
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 33 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (32 total)
-
State v. Drayton, 226 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)…1968, 400 F. 2d 797. See also Giles v. Maryland, 1967, 386 U.S. 66, 87 S.Ct. 793, 17 L.Ed. 2d 737; United States v. Westmoreland, S.D.Ind.1967, 41 F.R.D. 419. But cf. Peek v. United States, 9th Cir. 1963, 321 F. 2d 934, 5 A.L.R.3d 802, cert. denied, 376 U.S. 954, 84 S.Ct. 973, 11 L.Ed.2d 973. Compare Manon v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 220 So. 2d 34.…
-
Williams v. Beto, 354 F.2d 698 (5th Cir. 1965)…05] 1961), 285 F. 2d 733; Nutt v. United States, (10 Cir., 1964), 335 F. 2d 817, cert. den. 379 U.S. 909, 85 S.Ct. 203, 13 L.Ed.2d 180; Root v. Cunningham, (4 Cir., 1965), 344 F. 2d 1; Peek v. United States, (9 Cir., 1963), 321 F. 2d 934, cert. den. 376 U.S. 954, 84 S.Ct. 973, 11 L.Ed. 2d 973. This court has considered lack of effective counsel cases before and has laid down standards which we now reaffirm and again call to the attention of the Bar of this Circuit. We have not hesitated to grant habeas cor…
-
United States v. Eaglin, 571 F.2d 1069 (9th Cir. 1977)…el did for Kutas, an alibi defense. The question of whether or not a conflict of interest arose in the course of a joint trial has turned on the particular facts of each case. Peek v. United States, 321 F. 2d 934, 944 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 954, 84 S.Ct. 973, 11 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964). It is the defendant who bears the burden of demonstrating that specific prejudice has resulted to him from the alleged conflict of interest. United States v. Kutas, 542 F. 2d 527, 529 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. deni…
Previewing 3 of 32 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence