WALTREUS

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Morris v. State, 456 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …you want?;” when officer said “heroin,” defendant said: “Fine, wait here, I’ll be back in about two minutes;” then returned and made transaction) and cases collected therein, e.g., Berry v. United States, 324 F. 2d 407 (D.C.Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 959, 84 S.Ct. 972, 11 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964) (defendant who on first offer to buy, reached into his pocket and retrieved a supply of heroin, came equipped to do business); Trice v. United States, 211 F. 2d 513 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 900, 75 S.Ct…
• Chrisp Heard, Jr. v. United States, 348 F.2d 43 (D.C. Cir. 1964)
  …hat the evidence necessitated an instruction on entrapment. On the circumstances in this case, we cannot conclude that failure to so instruct was reversible error. See Berry v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 375, 324 F. 2d 407 (1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 959, 84 S.Ct. 972, 11 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964). . The dissent argues that under McDonald only the jurors, not psychiatrists or judg-. es, should pass on criminal responsibility. This oversimplification of the issue overlooks the historic proposition that jur…
• United States v. Riley, 363 F.2d 955 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …Rodriguez v. United States, 227 F. 2d 912 (5 Cir. 1955); Hester v. United States, 303 F. 2d 47 (10 Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 847, 83 S.Ct. 80, 9 L.Ed.2d 82 (1962); Berry v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 375, 324 F. 2d 407 (1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 959, 84 S.Ct. 972, 11 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964),3 with others condemning a failure to put the issue to the jury although the evidence on propensity strongly favored the prosecution. See, e.g., Wall v. United States, 65 F. 2d 993 (5 Cir. 1933); Ryles v. United…

  ← 1 / 2 →