ALL STATES FREIGHT, INC., ET AL.

v.

NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1965)
  …s issued on them nullities; the respondents, as the persons first making application [*4] after the promulgation of the 1958 regulation, were held to be entitled to the leases. 116 U. S. App. D. C. 379, 324 F. 2d 411 (1963). We granted certiorari, 376 U. S. 961. We conclude that the District Court correctly refused to issue a writ of mandamus, and accordingly reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Since their promulgation, the Secretary has consistently construed both orders not to bar oil and gas…
• All States Freight, Inc. v. New York, 379 U.S. 343 (U.S. 1964)
  …strict Court set aside the Commission’s order and enjoined its enforcement, holding that the order rested on an erroneous interpretation of § 1 (6) of the Act. The intervening protestants brought this appeal here, and we noted probable jurisdiction. 376 U. S. 961.6 [*348] It is clear that § 1 (6) gives the Commission power to require that carriers maintain just and reasonable classifications in conjunction with the setting of class rates. The question here posed is whether that section applies to commodity r…