TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING CO.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp., 410 F.2d 953 (6th Cir. 1969)
  …it, the information is presumptively relevant to bargainable issues'. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 347 F. 2d 61, 69 (3rd Cir.1965); Timkin Roller Bearing Co. v. N. L. R. B. 325 F. 2d 746, 750, 2 A.L.R.3d 868 (6th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964). Where the request is for information concerning employees outside the bargaining unit, the Union must show that the requested information is relevant to bargainable issues. N. L. R. B. v. Goodyear Aerospace Co…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Cal. Edison Co., 646 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …ion understood the right to have been waived, and sought to regain it. A union does not necessarily waive a right by failing to negotiate a contractual confirmation. Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 325 F. 2d 746, 750-51 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85 (1964). Silence in the bargaining agreement cannot be considered to be a waiver even in light of the bargaining history. Id. at 751. The failure to obtain a contractual confirmation of a right is evidence of waiver, e.…
• Int'l Tel. & Tel. Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 382 F.2d 366 (3d Cir. 1967)
  …ant data. Waiver of a statutory right to information, within the provisions of section 8(d) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(d), must be in “clear and unmistakable language”. Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. NLRB, 6th Cir., 1963, 325 F. 2d 746, cert. denied 376 U.S. 971, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 85. Silence in the bargaining agreement is insufficient to constitute such waiver. Thus, the petitioner will be required to turn over the data relied upon in recommending, allocation of the two-thirds portion of the merit…