REPUBLIC STEEL CORP.

v.

MADDOX

Citator

Cited By

• Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650 (U.S. 1965)
  …, cases decided under the Railway Labor Act,5 were cited to support the proposition. Furthermore, it was held that under Alabama law Maddox was not required to exhaust the contract grievance procedures. We granted Republic’s petition for certiorari, 377 U. S. 904, to determine whether the rationale of Moore v. Illinois Central R. Co. carries over to a suit for severance pay on a contract subject to § 301 (a) of the Labor Management Relations Act.6 We conclude that the state judgment must be reversed. I. As…
• Retail Clerks Int'l Ass'n v. Lion DRY Goods, Inc., 341 F.2d 715 (6th Cir. 1965)
  …ances existing, is a question for the decision of the arbitrator. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston, etc., supra, 376 U.S. 543, 555-559, 84 S.Ct. 909; Local 748, etc. v. Jefferson City Cabinet Co., 314 F. 2d 192, 194-196, C.A. 6th, cert. denied, 377 U.S. 904, 84 S.Ct. 1162, 12 L.Ed.2d 175. Usually, collective bargaining contracts calling for arbitration provide that the decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding. Paragraph 7 of LaSalle’s Statement of Understanding so provided. There is no re…
• Avco Corp. v. Mitchell, 336 F.2d 289 (6th Cir. 1964)
  …n of the subject provision and not an addition to the contract. The requirement that a grievance shall be submitted within five days is procedural. This Court held in Local 748, etc. v. Jefferson City Cabinet Co., 6 Cir., 314 F. 2d 192, cert. den., 377 U.S. 904, 84 S.Ct. 1162, 12 L.Ed.2d 175, that whether there has been sufficient compliance with preliminary steps in grievance procedure is a matter for the board of arbitration to determine rather than the court. In arriving at this conclusion we followed t…