RUDOLPH
v.
ALABAMA
RUDOLPH
ALABAMA
377 U.S. 919
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Rico Latimore & Arthur Vesey v. Allyn R. Sielaff, 561 F.2d 691 (7th Cir. 1977)…), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 871, 97 S.Ct. 185, 50 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976); State v. Purvis, 157 Conn. 198, 251 A. 2d 178 (1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 928, 89 S.Ct. 1788, 23 L.Ed.2d 246 (1969); Ex parte Rudolph, 276 Ala. 392, 162 So. 2d 486, cert. denied, 377 U.S. 919, 84 S.Ct. 1185, 12 L.Ed.2d 188 (1964); Price v. State, 496 S.W. 2d 103 (Tex.Cr.App.1973). Primary justification for this practice lies in protection of the personal dignity of the complaining witness.3 4 The Supreme Court has recognized that, shor…