LUCAS
v.
KLINGER, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

U.S. | 1964-04-28
No. 1187
377 U.S. 920 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jhirad v. Ferrandina, 536 F.2d 478 (2d Cir. 1976)
    …le as he asked to do. Nor has Jhirad demonstrated any prejudice flowing from Judge Duffy’s ruling. Cf. U. S. ex rel. Petrushansky v. Marasco, 325 F. 2d 562 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 952, 84 S.Ct. 969, 11 L.Ed.2d 971 (1964), reh. denied, 377 U.S. 920, 84 S.Ct. 1178, 12 L.Ed.2d 188 (1964). Under the facts here presented, we hold that Judge Duffy properly exercised his discretion in denying discovery. Jhirad next urges that India was obligated to prove beyond a reasonable doubt both the motivatio…
  • …v. United States, 374 F. 2d 427, 431 (8th Cir. 1967); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-(l). See also Stevens Bros. Foundation, Inc. v. Commissioner, 324 F. 2d 633, 638 (8th Cir. 1963), cert. denied 396 U.S. 969, 84 S.Ct. 1135, 12 L.Ed.2d 84, reh. denied, 377 U.S. 920, 84 S.Ct. 1179, 12 L.Ed.2d 189 (1964). The term “charitable”, as used in § 501(c)(3), is to be construed in “its generally accepted legal sense” and includes within its scope “Relief of the poor.” Treasury Regulations on Income Tax (1954 Code), § 1…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw