MUELLER COMPANY

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc., 637 F.2d 105 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …uantity discount system violated the act because the largest discounts were actually unavailable to the great majority of Morton’s customers. Id. at 42-43, 68 S.Ct. at 826; see also Mueller Co. v. FTC, 323 F. 2d 44, 46 (7th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 923, 84 S.Ct. 1219, 12 [*121] L.Ed.2d 215 (1964). The Court emphasized that a major purpose of the Robinson-Pat-man Act was to eliminate the competitive advantage of a large buyer “over a small buyer solely because of the large buyer’s quantity purcha…
• Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)
  …5 N.L.R.B. 152, 157 (1963). . See N.L.R.B. v. Yawman & Erbe Mfg. Co., 187 F. 2d 947, 949 (2 Cir. 1951). . 142 N.L.R.B. 304, enforced, Hollywood Brands v. N.L.R.B., 324 F. 2d 956 (5 Cir. 1963), rehearing denied, 5 Cir., 326 F. 2d 400, cert. denied, 377 U.S. 923, 84 S.Ct. 1221, 12 L.Ed.2d 215 (1964). . There may be exceptions to this general rule. See Local 24 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc., v. Oliver, 358 U.S. 283, 79 S.Ct. 297, 3 L.Ed.2d 312 (1959), where the working conditions of non-un…
• Am. Cyanamid Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 363 F.2d 757 (6th Cir. 1966)
  …spect thereto. Decker v. Federal Trade Commission, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 137, 176 F. 2d 461, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 878, 70 S.Ct. 159, 94 L.Ed. 539; cf. Baldwin Bracelet Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 325 F. 2d 1012, cert. denied, 377 U.S. 923, 84 S.Ct. 1221, 12 L.Ed.2d 215. It is not accurate to accuse the Commission of “second guessing” the Patent Office. The Commission had before it evidence which it found to have been withheld from the Patent Office and passed upon a situation which…