WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR,

v.

MODERN TRASHMOVAL, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• T. Smith & SON, Inc. v. Skibs A/S Hassel, 362 F.2d 745 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …omboot, etc., D.C. S.D.Tex.1962, 205 F.Supp. 295, 223 F. Supp. 102, aff. sub nom. Strachan Shipping Co. v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche [*748] Stoomboot etc., 5th Cir. 1963, 324 F. 2d 746, cert. den. 376 U.S. 954, 84 S.Ct. 969, 11 L.Ed.2d 972, reh. den. 377 U.S. 925, 84 S.Ct. 1219,12 L.Ed.2d 217; Brown v. San Alberto Cia Armadora, S.A., 3rd Cir. 1962, 305 F. 2d 602; DeGioia v. United States Lines Company, 2nd Cir. 1962, 304 F. 2d 421; Paliaga v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, 2nd Cir. 1962, 301 F. 2d 403. The j…
• United States v. 9.19 Acres OF Land, 416 F.2d 1244 (6th Cir. 1969)
  …must be found in the circumstances present in every case, particularly in the reasons presented to the trial judge at the time the request is denied.” Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575, 589, 84 S.Ct. 841, 849, 11 L.Ed.2d 921 (1963), rehearing denied, 377 U.S. 925, 84 S.Ct. 1218, 12 L.Ed.2d 217. In the District Court, the Appellant’s president contended that neither the notice of condemnation, nor Rule 71A(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, expressly required that the condemnee have a lawyer; that a Depar…
• United States v. Valdez, 418 F.2d 363 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …the granting of a continuance. Under these circumstances the denial of a continuance was not a violation of discretion and failed to prejudice appellant Randall. Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575, 84 S.Ct. 841, 11 L.Ed.2d 921 (1964), rehearing denied, 377 U.S. 925, 84 S.Ct. 1218,12 L.Ed.2d 217; Gardiner v. United States, 321 F. 2d 159 (5th Cir. 1963); Neufield v. United States, 73 App.D.C. 174, 118 F. 2d 375 (1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 798, 62 S.Ct. 580, 86 L.Ed. 1199. Affirmed. . Pursuant to Rule 18 of…