JANKOVICH ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS CALUMET AVIATION CO.,
v.
INDIANA TOLL ROAD COMMISSION
JANKOVICH ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS CALUMET AVIATION CO.,
INDIANA TOLL ROAD COMMISSION
377 U.S. 942
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 380 U.S. 374 (U.S. 1965)…new order narrowing and clarifying its original order to comply with the court’s mandate. The Court of Appeals again found unsatisfactory that portion of the order dealing with simulated props and refused to enforce [*378] it. We granted certiorari, 377 U. S. 942, to consider this aspect of the case and do not have before us any question concerning the misrepresentation that Rapid Shave could shave sandpaper immediately after application, that being conceded. I. A threshold question presented is whether th…
-
Crider v. Zurich Ins. Co., 380 U.S. 39 (U.S. 1965)…s Alabama judgment, federal jurisdiction being based on diversity of citizenship. The District Court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss (224 F. Supp. 87) and the Court of Appeals affirmed. 324 F. 2d 499. The case is here on a writ of certiorari. 377 U. S. 942. The District Court and the Court of Appeals stood on Green v. J. A. Jones Construct. Co., 161 F. 2d 369, which held that a Mississippi state court had no jurisdiction to award damages under the Georgia Workmen’s Compensation Act and that the Feder…
-
Jankovich v. Ind. Toll Rd. Comm'n, 379 U.S. 487 (U.S. 1965)…ity of airport zoning regulations under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and therefore presented important questions affecting the National Airport Plan not previously considered by this Court, we granted certiorari. 377 U. S. 942. Respondent suggests, however, that we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the Supreme Court of Indiana because that judgment was based on an independent and adequate state ground. It is undoubtedly “ ‘the settled rule that where th…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence