PACCIONE

v.

HERITAGE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 650 F.2d 1365 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …le is to prevent the shaping of testimony by one witness to match that of another, and to discourage fabrication and collusion. Taylor v. United States, 388 F. 2d 786 (9th Cir. 1967); United States v. Leggett, 326 F. 2d 613 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 955, 84 S.Ct. 1633, 12 L.Ed.2d 499 (1964). The opportunity to shape testimony is as great with a witness who reads trial testimony as with one who hears the testimony in open court. The harm may be even more pronounced with a witness who reads trial t…
• United States v. Quinto, 582 F.2d 224 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …at 1029 (prior consistent statement to bolster witness’s testimony inadmissible “even after the witness whose testimony is sought to be bolstered has been contradicted”); United States v. Leggett, 312 F. 2d 566, 572-73 (4th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 955, 84 S.Ct. 1633, 12 L.Ed.2d 499 (1964); see People v. Williams, 403 N.Y.S.2d 548 (2d Dep’t 1978). We therefore conclude that the memorandum was irrelevant for the rehabilitative purpose of bolstering Agent Wall-work’s challenged credibility and, to…
• Henley v. Heritage, 337 F.2d 847 (5th Cir. 1964)
  …400, 249 F. 2d 492; Payne v. Madigan, 9 Cir., 1960, 274 F. 2d 702, aff’d by an equally divided Court, 1961, 366 U.S. 761, 81 S.Ct. 1670, 6 L.Ed.2d 853. See also our recent case of Paccione v. Heritage, 5 Cir., 1963, 323 F. 2d 378 cert. denied [*849] 377 U.S. 955, 84 S.Ct. 1632, 12 L.Ed.2d 498, for language of a judgment somewhat similar to that of the oral sentence here. The language of the judgment in that ease cleared up an ambiguity in the oral sentence, and it was held that the judgment and sentence tog…