WILSON
v.
ILLINOIS
WILSON
ILLINOIS
377 U.S. 955
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 650 F.2d 1365 (5th Cir. 1981)…le is to prevent the shaping of testimony by one witness to match that of another, and to discourage fabrication and collusion. Taylor v. United States, 388 F. 2d 786 (9th Cir. 1967); United States v. Leggett, 326 F. 2d 613 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 955, 84 S.Ct. 1633, 12 L.Ed.2d 499 (1964). The opportunity to shape testimony is as great with a witness who reads trial testimony as with one who hears the testimony in open court. The harm may be even more pronounced with a witness who reads trial t…
-
McBEE v. Weaver, 355 F.2d 445 (6th Cir. 1966)…ied, was read in evidence over the objection of petitioner’s lawyer. This conviction was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Tennessee (McBee v. State, 213 Tenn. 15, 372 S.W. 2d 173 (1963) ) and the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari. 377 U.S. 955, 84 S.Ct. 1633, 12 L.Ed.2d 499 (1964). In 1964, petitioner filed another habeas corpus petition in the District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, alleging that his Fourteenth Amendment rights had been violated by the admission in evidenc…