ELLIS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Quinto, 582 F.2d 224 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …at 1029 (prior consistent statement to bolster witness’s testimony inadmissible “even after the witness whose testimony is sought to be bolstered has been contradicted”); United States v. Leggett, 312 F. 2d 566, 572-73 (4th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 955, 84 S.Ct. 1633, 12 L.Ed.2d 499 (1964); see People v. Williams, 403 N.Y.S.2d 548 (2d Dep’t 1978). We therefore conclude that the memorandum was irrelevant for the rehabilitative purpose of bolstering Agent Wall-work’s challenged credibility and, to…
• Henley v. Heritage, 337 F.2d 847 (5th Cir. 1964)
  …400, 249 F. 2d 492; Payne v. Madigan, 9 Cir., 1960, 274 F. 2d 702, aff’d by an equally divided Court, 1961, 366 U.S. 761, 81 S.Ct. 1670, 6 L.Ed.2d 853. See also our recent case of Paccione v. Heritage, 5 Cir., 1963, 323 F. 2d 378 cert. denied [*849] 377 U.S. 955, 84 S.Ct. 1632, 12 L.Ed.2d 498, for language of a judgment somewhat similar to that of the oral sentence here. The language of the judgment in that ease cleared up an ambiguity in the oral sentence, and it was held that the judgment and sentence tog…
• United States v. Aguilar, 756 F.2d 1418 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …8, 1244 (9th Cir.1983). This indictment was duplicitous since each count alleged the two separate and distinct offenses which 18 U.S.C. § 912 states in its two clauses. See United States v. Leggett, 312 F. 2d 566, 569 (4th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 955, 84 S.Ct. 1633, 12 L.Ed.2d 499 (1964) (indictment stated violations of both clauses in one count and was duplicitous), on remand 326 F. 2d 613 (4th Cir.1964) (after duplicity was cured by government’s election to proceed on one clause only). Cf. U…