ALLEN
v.
OKLAHOMA
ALLEN
OKLAHOMA
377 U.S. 969
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 50 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (50 total)
-
United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)…questions will not invoke the section.” United States v. Beneke, 449 F. 2d 1259 (8th Cir. 1971), quoting Barry v. Sigler, 373 F. 2d 835, 836 (8th Cir. 1967), in turn quoting Lyons v. United States, 325 F. 2d 370, 376 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 969, 84 S.Ct. 1650, 12 L.Ed.2d 738 (1964). . As Chief Judge of the District Court during the pretrial era of these cases, Judge Sirica had supervisory responsibility over grand jury matters. See, e. g., In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 360 F.Supp. 1 (D.D.C.)…
-
Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (U.S. 1994)…t many, perhaps most, Courts of Appeals considered knowledge (and the resulting attitudes) that a judge properly acquired in an earlier proceeding not to be “extrajudicial.” See, e. g., Lyons v. United States, 325 F. 2d 370, 376 (CA9), cert. denied, 377 U. S. 969 (1964); Craven v. United States, 22 F. 2d 605, 607-608 (CA1 1927). Secondly, the doctrine was often quoted as justifying the refusal to consider trial rulings as the basis for § 144 recusal. See, e. g., Toth v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 862 F. 2d…
-
United States v. Ralph "Whitey" Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir. 1969)…ecord does not automatically or inferentially raise an issue of bias or disqualify him from presiding at a trial at which the jury is to determine that person’s guilt or innocence. Lyons v. United States, 325 F. 2d 370 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 969, 84 S.Ct. 1650, 12 L.Ed.2d 738 (1964); Barry v. Sigler, 373 F. 2d 835 (8th Cir. 1967); United States v. Kravitz, 303 F. 2d 700 (3d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 922, 83 S.Ct. 290, 9 L.Ed.2d 231 (1962). The mere presence of an Assistant United…
Previewing 3 of 50 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence