DARLING

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Ross v. United States, 349 F.2d 210 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
  …ow v. United States, 301 F. 2d 361, 366 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 814, 83 S.Ct. 25, 9 L.Ed.2d 56 (1962); and see Nickens v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 338, 339, 323 F. 2d 808, 809 (1963). . 117 U.S.App.D.C. 231, 328 F. 2d 532 (1964). . 377 U.S. 972, 84 S.Ct. 1654, 12 L.Ed.2d 741 (1964). . 119 U.S.App.D.C. 364, 343 F. 2d 233 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 984, 85 S.Ct 1353, 14 L.Ed.2d 276 (1965). . 357 U.S. 386, 393, 78 S.Ct. 1280, 2 L.Ed. 2d 1405 (1958). . Id. at 390, 78 S.Ct. at 1283. . B…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Austin v. United States, 382 F.2d 129 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …Ill We have examined appellant’s other claims of error, which relate primarily to the court’s instructions on the insanity claim. Taking the instructions as a whole, see Redfield v. United States, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 231, 328 F. 2d 532, cert. denied, 377 U.S. 972, 84 S.Ct. 1654, 12 L.Ed.2d 741 (1964), we do not find error “affecting substantial rights.” Rules 52(a) and (b), Fed.R.Crim.P. The issue then arises as to what remedy is appropriate to correct the court’s error in failing to grant acquittal of first…
• Frazier v. United States, 419 F.2d 1161 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
  …o apply where the unnecessary delay in presentment to a magistrate occurs after a confession. Coor v. United States, supra note 21, 119 U.S.App.D.C. at 260, 340 F. 2d at 785, Bailey v. United States, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 241, 328 F. 2d 542, cert. denied 377 U.S. 972, 84 S.Ct. 1655, 12 L.Ed.2d 741 (1964); Lockley v. United States, 106 U.S.App. D.C. 163, 270 F. 2d 915 (1959); Porter v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 385, 258 F. 2d 685, 692 (1958), cert. denied 360 U.S. 906, 79 S.Ct. 1289, 3 L.Ed.2d 1257 (1959) ;…