UNITED STATES

v.

BARNETT ET AL.; MERCER V. THERIOT; PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE CO. V. FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN DALLAS, ADMINISTRATOR; DELANEY V. OREGON

Citator

Cited By

• Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 (U.S. 1968)
  …th Amendments forbid both the Federal Government and the States from depriving any person of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” Notwithstanding these provisions, until United States v. Barnett, 376 U. S. 681, rehearing denied, 377 U. S. 973 (1964), the Court consistently upheld the constitutional power of the state and federal courts to punish [*196] any criminal contempt without a jury trial. Eileribecker v. District Court of Plymouth County, 134 U. S. 31, 36-39 (1890); I. C. C. v. B…
• RAD Servs., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 808 F.2d 271 (3d Cir. 1986)
  …trict court improperly admitted the depositions into evidence, we hold that the error would as in Lionti be harmless. See Lionti, 709 F. 2d at 243; Mercer v. Theriot, 377 U.S. 152, 154, 84 S.Ct. 1157, 1159, 12 L.Ed.2d 206 (per curiam), reh’g denied, 377 U.S. 973, 84 S.Ct. 1643, 12 L.Ed.2d 743 (1964). See also Fed.R.Civ.P. 61 (providing that errors in the admission of evidence are not grounds for ordering a new trial or otherwise for disturbing a judgment unless the refusal to do so would offend “substantial…
• Raines v. State OF Ala., 552 F.2d 660 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …ing whether the crime was sufficiently serious to require a jury trial focused on the length of the sentence imposed and not on the nature of the crime. Cf. United States v. Barnett, 1964, 376 U.S. 681, 84 S.Ct. 984, 12 L.Ed.2d 23, rehearing denied, 377 U.S. 973, 84 S.Ct. 1642, 12 L.Ed.2d 742. C. It would not have been an unreasonable conclusion, based on developments in delinquency proceedings and the broad holdings in Duncan and Bloom, that the jury trial right would attach in juvenile and related proce…