YOUNG

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (39 total)

• Damon v. State, 397 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …hich does not involve conflicting theories of defense, we hold that error has not been demonstrated on this point. Gurleski v. United States, 405 F. 2d 253, 264-65 (5th Cir. 1968); Hayes v. United States, 329 F. 2d 209 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 980, 84 S.Ct. 1883, 12 L.Ed.2d 748 (1964); United States v. Nakaladski, 481 F. 2d 289, 301-02 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Enten, 332 F.Supp. 249 (D.D.C.1971). n Burglary Convictions Proper The only claim common to both appellants which requires…
• Bumgarner v. State, 245 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)
  …, was a contempt of court because it was done by the appellant without having any reasonable support in fact for the assertions of conspiracy. Neering v. State, Fla.App.1962, 141 So. 2d 615 (cert. denied, Fla.1963, 155 So. 2d 874, cert. denied 1964, 377 U.S. 980, 84 S.Ct. 1880, 12 L.Ed.2d 748, reh. denied, 379 U.S. 871, 85 S.Ct. 16, 13 L.Ed.2d 78); Manning v. State, supra; and Thomas v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 210 So. 2d 488. The appellant’s second point states: “Whether a sentence of one year for criminal…
• Barry v. State, 330 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …. Barry’s counsel was entitled as of right to a reasonable opportunity to make a submission, by testimony or otherwise, on any matter “relevant to the sentence.” Rule 3.720(b), R.Cr.P. Neering v. State, 164 So. 2d 29 (Fla.App. 1st, 1964), cert. den. 377 U.S. 980, 84 S.Ct. 1880, 12 L.Ed.2d 748 (1964), reh. den. 379 U.S. 871, 85 S.Ct. 16, 13 L.Ed.2d 78 (1964). However, because the trial court heard and evidently considered the evidence which Barry’s counsel presented and there is no indication that any eviden…