SHIPP

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• LEE v. State, 173 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)
  …e motion to vacate and set aside the judgment of conviction rendered against appellant is free from error, and it is accordingly affirmed. CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur. . Lee v. State, (Fla.App.1963) 153 So. 2d 351. . Lee v. Florida, 377 U.S. 999, 84 S.Ct 1924, 12 L.Ed.2d 1049. . Washington v. State, 95 Fla. 298, 113 So. 470. . State ex rel. Landis v. Lewis, 118 Fla. 910, 160 So. 485. . Baker v. State, 150 Fla. 446, 451, 7 So. 2d 792. . Bailey v. Henslee, 8 Cir., 287 F. 2d 936; U. S. ex…
• Hanger v. United States, 398 F.2d 91 (8th Cir. 1968)
  …a wide range of discretion in the matter of granting separate trials, and that it must be affirmatively shown that prejudice resulted from the failure to grant a separate trial.” Fisher v. United States, 324 F. 2d 775, 781 (8 Cir.1963), cert. denied 377 U.S. 999, 84 S.Ct. 1935, 12 L.Ed.2d 1049; see Golliher v. United States, 362 F. 2d 594, 603 (8 Cir.1966). The defendants were charged jointly in a substantive count and a conspiracy count. There has been no showing of [*100] prejudice. Rizzo v. United State…
• United States v. Barrow, 363 F.2d 62 (3d Cir. 1966)
  …United States v. Miller, supra; Milam v. United States, 322 F. 2d 104, 110 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. den. Kimball v. United States, 377 U.S. 911, 84 S.Ct. 1174, 12 L.Ed.2d 181; Fisher v. United States, 324 F. 2d 775, 780-781 (8th Cir. 1963), cert. den. 377 U.S. 999, 84 S.Ct. 1935, 12 L.Ed.2d 1049. We find no abuse of discretion in the case before us. Lastly, the appellants maintain that the denial of their respective motions for a new trial was reversible error. It is argued that the joint trial was prejudici…