RANDAZZO ET AL.

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• In the Interest of I. S. H., 344 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
  …tical or equivalent statutes, the courts have consistently held that a witness, and particularly a defendant, may not be impeached by a showing of prior juvenile adjudications. E. g., State v. Reynolds, 41 N.J. 163, 195 A. 2d 449 (1963), cert. den., 377 U.S. 1000, 84 S.Ct. 1930, 12 L.Ed.2d 1050 (1964); People v. Peele, 12 N.Y.2d 890, 237 N.Y.S.2d 999, 188 N.E. 2d 265 (1963); State v. Burr, 18 Or.App. 494, 525 P. 2d 1067 (1974); 81 Am.Jur.2d, Witnesses, § 575, pp. 580-581; see Jackson v. State, 336 So. 2d 633…
• State v. Francois, 197 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 1967)
  …ing, 21 A.D.2d 959, 251 N.Y.S.2d 814; State v. Smith (1960), 32 N.J. 501, 161 A. 2d 520, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 936, 81 S.Ct. 383, 5 L.Ed.2d 367 (1961); United States ex rel. Smith v. State of New Jersey, 323 F. 2d 156 (3rd Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1000, 84 S.Ct. 1927, 12 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1964); and State v. Gullings (Or.1966), 416 P. 2d 311. It is clear from the records here that the evils sought to be overcome by federal and state legislation were recognized and the “principles of fundamental fairn…
• United States v. DiFRANCESCO, 449 U.S. 117 (U.S. 1980)
  …ctions have not been considered to be viola-tive of the Clause. Thus, there is no double jeopardy protection against revocation of probation and the imposition of imprisonment. See, e. g., Thomas v. United States, 327 F. 2d 795 (CA10), cert. denied, 377 U. S. 1000 (1964). There are other situations where probation or parole may be revoked and sentence of imprisonment imposed. See, e. g., United States v. Kuck, 573 F. 2d 25 (CA10 1978); United States v. Walden, 578 F. 2d 966, 972 (CA3 1978), cert. denied, 444…