ELFBRANDT
v.
RUSSELL ET AL.

U.S. | 1964-06-15
Nos. 553, Misc.
378 U.S. 127 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona for further consideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U. S. 360.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11 (U.S. 1966)
    …1, §§36.5, 36.6. See the findings of Congress, Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950, 50 U. S. C. § 781 (1964 ed.), and of the Arizona Legislature, Arizona Communist Control Act of 1961, Ariz. Laws 1961, c. 108, § 2. On remand from this.Court, 378 U. S. 127, the Arizona Supreme Court gave the oath and statute a narrow reading that eliminated their vulnerability to the charge of being unconstitutionally vague. 97 Ariz. 140, 397 P. 2d 944. See Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U. S. 360. Although the majority on…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw