MEYERS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF WASHINGTON,
v.
THIGPEN ET AL.

U.S. | 1964-06-22
No. 381
Mr. Justice Clark would affirm on the grounds stated in his opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 587., Mr. Justice Stewart would remand for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U. S. 713, 744., Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 589.
378 U.S. 554 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 12 L. Ed. 2d 1024 · 84 S. Ct. 1905 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 840 · SCDB 1963-169
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The judgment regarding the apportionment of seats in the Washington Legislature is affirmed on the merits, but the case is remanded for further proceedings concerning relief.


Facts & Procedural History

This case concerns the apportionment of seats in the Washington Legislature. The judgment below addressed this apportionment and also a scheme of cong…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The judgment below is affirmed on the merits, insofar as it relates to the apportionment of seats in the Washington Legislature. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533. The case is remanded for further proceedings, with respect to relief, consistent with the views stated in our opinions in Reynolds v. Sims and in the other cases relating to state legislative apportionment decided along with Reynolds. Since no question relating to the correctness of that part of the decision below holding valid the scheme of congressional districting in the State of Washington is presented in this appeal, we do not consider or pass upon that issue.

Mr. Justice Clark would affirm on the grounds stated in his opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 587. Mr. Justice Stewart would remand for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in his dissenting opinion in Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado, 377 U. S. 713, 744.

Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 589.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Pan-American Life Ins. Co. v. Inocencio Blanco, 362 F.2d 167 (5th Cir. 1966)
    …ife Insurance Co. v. Recio, Fla., 154 So. 2d 197, cert. den. 377 U.S. 990, 84 S.Ct. 1908, 12 L.Ed.2d 1044, reh. den. 379 U.S. 871, 85 S.Ct. 17, 13 L. Ed.2d 78; Pan-American Life Insurance Co. v. Lorido, Fla., 154 So. 2d 200, cert. den. 377 U.S. 990, 84 S.Ct. 1905, 12 L.Ed. 2d 1043, reh. den. 379 U.S. 871, 85 S.Ct. 15, 13 L.Ed.2d 77. See Confederation Life Association v. Ugalde, Fla., 164 So. 2d 1. Therefore, for the law governing performance, we look to state rules for our guides. The Zabaleta policy, origin…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw