DEL HOYO
v.
NEW YORK

U.S. | 1964-06-22
Nos. 893, Misc.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
378 U.S. 570 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Harris v. Louie L. Wainwright, 406 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1969)
    …68 So. 2d 674. . See the post-trial determinations of Jackson v. Denno, 1964, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 on volun-tariness; Lopez v. Texas, 1964, 378 U.S. 567, 84 S.Ct. 1924, 12 L.Ed.2d 1038, per curiam; Del Hoyo v. New York, 1964, 378 U.S. 570, 84 S.Ct. 1928, 12 L.Ed.2d 1039, per curiam. . See, e. g., affording a meaningful out-of-time direct appeal: McKinney v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 403 F. 2d 57; Lyles v. United States, 5 Cir., 1965, 346 F. 2d 789; Camp v. United States, 5 Cir.,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw