HARRIS
v.
TEXAS
HARRIS
TEXAS
378 U.S. 572
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. The State OF Tex., 395 F.2d 958 (5th Cir. 1968)…y depend.” 378 U.S., at 391, 84 S.Ct., at 1788, 12 L.Ed.2d, at 924. On the same day as the decision in Jackson v. Denno, the Supreme Court, in memorandum opinions in Lopez v. Texas, 378 U.S. 567, 84 S.Ct. 1924, 12 L.Ed.2d 1038, and Harris v. Texas, 378 U.S. 572, 84 S.Ct. 1930, 12 L.Ed.2d 1040, held that the procedure followed in those cases had the same vice as the condemned New York practice. [*961] The evidentiary hearing on the present petition for writ of habeas corpus was held at a time when the able…
-
Williams v. Beto, 386 F.2d 16 (5th Cir. 1967)…” Lopez v. State, Tex.Cr.App.1964, 384 S.W. 2d 345, 349, on remand for proceedings consistent with Jackson v. Denno, 1964, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908. See also Harris v. State, Tex.Cr.App.1964, 384 S.W. 2d 349, also on remand, 1964, 378 U.S. 572, 84 S.Ct. 1930, 12 L.Ed.2d 1040. In a recent per curiam opinion the Supreme Court clarified Jackson v. Denno: “This Court has never ruled that all voluntariness hearings must be held outside the presence of the jury, regardless of the circumstances…