INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS, INC., ET AL.

v.

WASHINGTON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Inland Empire Builders, Inc. v. The United States, 424 F.2d 1370 (Ct. Cl. 1970)
  …of any increase in state retail sales taxes after the contract date. This line of argument must also be rejected. In Murray v. State of Washington, 62 Wash.2d 619, 384 P. 2d 337 (1963), appeal dismissed, Inland Empire Builders, Inc. v. Washington, 378 U.S. 580, 84 S.Ct. 1910, 12 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1964), several contractors (including plaintiffs) sued to recover state retail sales taxes paid under protest, and to enjoin assessment of the state retail sales tax, in connection with the construction of Capehart A…
• Lutz v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 396 F.2d 412 (9th Cir. 1968)
  …1, 1963, holding that the tax did apply to these federal construction projects. Murray v. State, 62 Wash.2d 619, 384 P. 2d 337 (1963). On June 22, 1964, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Inland Empire Builders, Inc. v. Washington, 378 U.S. 580, 84 S.Ct. 1910, 12 L.Ed.2d 1035 (1964). [*419] Within this structure the petitioners actions must be examined. Their family partnership was granted two Capehart contracts by the United States, one on August 21, 1958, and the other on May 10, 1960. T…

  ← 1 / 2 →