RUARK
v.
COLORADO

U.S. | 1964-06-22
Nos. 1173, Misc.
378 U.S. 585 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 12 L. Ed. 2d 1042 · 84 S. Ct. 1935 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 874 · SCDB 1963-184
Cited by 24 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Dissent
Mr. Justice Harlan,

Mr. Justice Harlan,

dissenting.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. Crouse, ante, p. 584, I would set this case for argument.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

  • Hanger v. United States, 398 F.2d 91 (8th Cir. 1968)
    …f discretion in the matter of granting separate trials, and that it must be affirmatively shown that prejudice resulted from the failure to grant a separate trial.” Fisher v. United States, 324 F. 2d 775, 781 (8 Cir.1963), cert. denied 377 U.S. 999, 84 S.Ct. 1935, 12 L.Ed.2d 1049; see Golliher v. United States, 362 F. 2d 594, 603 (8 Cir.1966). The defendants were charged jointly in a substantive count and a conspiracy count. There has been no showing of [*100] prejudice. Rizzo v. United States, 304 F. 2d 81…
  • United States v. Barrow, 363 F.2d 62 (3d Cir. 1966)
    …v. Miller, supra; Milam v. United States, 322 F. 2d 104, 110 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. den. Kimball v. United States, 377 U.S. 911, 84 S.Ct. 1174, 12 L.Ed.2d 181; Fisher v. United States, 324 F. 2d 775, 780-781 (8th Cir. 1963), cert. den. 377 U.S. 999, 84 S.Ct. 1935, 12 L.Ed.2d 1049. We find no abuse of discretion in the case before us. Lastly, the appellants maintain that the denial of their respective motions for a new trial was reversible error. It is argued that the joint trial was prejudicial. We are conv…
  • Haggard v. United States, 369 F.2d 968 (8th Cir. 1966)
    …cautionary instructions, will not require reversal with directions to sever, except in extreme cases. Delli Paoli v. United States, 352 U.S. 232, 77 S.Ct. 294, 1 L.Ed.2d 278;18 Fisher v. United States, 8 Cir., 324 F. 2d 775, cert. den. 377 U.S. 999, 84 S.Ct. 1935, 12 L.Ed.2d 1049; Golliher v. United States, 8 Cir., 362 F. 2d 594; Mee v. United States, 8 Cir., 316 F. 2d 467, cert. den. 377 U.S. 997, 84 S.Ct. 1923, 12 L.Ed.2d 1049, reh. den. 379 U.S. 873, 85 S.Ct. 20, 13 L.Ed.2d 80; Costello v. United States,…

Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw