PEOPLES
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1964-06-22
Nos. 934, Misc.
Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent.
378 U.S. 586 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration in light of Fallen v. United, States, ante, p. 139.

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Benny Peoples v. United States, 337 F.2d 91 (10th Cir. 1964)
    …Having granted certiorari, the Supreme Court vacated our judgment of dismissal and remanded the case “for consideration in the light of Fallen v. United States, 378 U.S. 139, 84 S.Ct. 1689, 12 L.Ed. 760, decided this date.” Peoples v. United States, 378 U.S. 586, 84 S.Ct. 1929, 12 L.Ed.2d 1040. We think this case clearly distinguishable-, from the facts in Fallen. In the Fallen case, letters written by the convicted defendant and addressed' to the Clerk of the Court “asking for a. new trial and for an app…
  • Ching v. United States, 338 F.2d 333 (10th Cir. 1964)
    …92 F. 2d 31. We must first consider the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely, for failure to comply with the jurisdictional requirements of Rule 37(a) (2), F.R.Crim.P. See: Peoples v. United States (10 CA), 324 F. 2d 689, remanded 378 U.S. 586, 84 S.Ct. 1929, 12 L.Ed.2d 1040 on remand 337 F. 2d 91 (September, 1964). The Court’s order denying the instant motion was filed May 13, 1964, but the appellant apparently did not receive it until May 25th. The requisite notice of appeal was notar…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw