CITY OF PLANTATION
v.
UTILITIES OPERATING CO., INC.

U.S. | 1964-10-12
No. 72
379 U.S. 2 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Application of Jacksonville Suburban Utilties Corp., 47 Fla. Supp. 73 (Fla. P.S.C. 1977)
    …. . the state has power to annul and supersede rates previously established by contract between utilities and their customers.” (Citation omitted.) See also: City of Plantation v. Utilities Operating Co., 156 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 1963), appeal dismissed 379 U. S. 2; Hampton Utilities Co. v. Hampton Homeowners Association, 252 So. 2d 286 (4th D. C. A. Fla. 1971). The commission action is only to modify the contract as to service availability charges that must be paid for connections to the utility’s system pro…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw