ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
379 U.S. 4
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United States, 433 F.2d 212 (8th Cir. 1970)…d not let the tariffs stand as “carrier-made rates.” Nor did it, as it has in some cases, order the tariffs canceled without prejudice to their amendment. See Accelerated Transport-Pony Express, Inc. v. United States, 227 F.Supp. 815 (D.Vt.), aff’d, 379 U.S. 4, 85 S.Ct. 43, 13 L.Ed.2d 21 (1964). Nor did it leave open to the carriers the option of producing additional evidence to justify these tariffs. Positive cancellation was required. Cases dealing with orders of the Commission in this form have not…1 / 2