WRIGHT
v.
ILLINOIS

U.S. | 1964-10-12
No. 273
379 U.S. 11 Supreme Court of the United States (1964) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of .jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Heaney v. Allen, 425 F.2d 869 (2d Cir. 1970)
    …on appeal from a unanimous decision by the highest court of New York sustaining its constitutionality, Wasmuth v. Allen, 14 N.Y.2d 391, 252 N.Y.S. 2d 65, 200 N.E. 2d 756, and the Court dismissed the appeal for want of a substantial federal question, 379 U.S. 11, 85 S.Ct. 86, 13 L.Ed.2d 23 (1964). Although plaintiffs say that in Wasmuth the sole constitutional attack was under the equal protection clause and not under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, we find no basis for this in the opinion of…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw