DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., INC., ET AL.

v.

BYRD

Citator

Cited By

• Sterling v. Velsicol Chem. Corp., 855 F.2d 1188 (6th Cir. 1988)
  …s impairment of enjoyment of life as an element of intangible damages, Martin v. Southern Railway, 225 Tenn. 77, 463 S.W. 2d 690 (1971); Dixie Feed & Seed Co. v. Byrd, 52 Tenn.App. 619, 376 S.W. 2d 745 (1963), cert. denied, Tenn.S.Ct., cert. denied, 379 U.S. 15, 85 S.Ct. 147, 13 L.Ed.2d 84 (1964), the court may not award this category of damages to non-residents on the theory of a nuisance action. Courts that have awarded damages on this basis have properly limited their award to residents of the area affe…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Thompson v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. & Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 621 F.2d 814 (6th Cir. 1980)
  …tangible elements of damage such as pain, suffering, inconvenience, and deprivation of the normal enjoyments of life”); Dixie Feed & Seed Co., Inc. v. Byrd, 52 Tenn.App. 619, 637, 376 S.W. 2d 745, 753 (1963), cert. denied, Tenn.S. Ct., cert. denied, 379 U.S. 15, 85 S.Ct. 147, 13 L.Ed.2d 84 (1964) (intangible elements of damages included “pain and suffering, inconvenience and the deprivation of the enjoyment of the normal activities of life”). However, both of these cases involved jury verdicts which were…