CROSS ET AL.
v.
BRUNING ET AL.
CROSS ET AL.
BRUNING ET AL.
379 U.S. 202
Supreme Court of the United States (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cross v. Bruning, 413 F.2d 678 (9th Cir. 1969)…e constitutionality of which she attacks. She then cited six additional sections of California statutes, as being relevant, as well as thirteen sections of the Constitution of California. The Supreme Court of the United States, in Cross v. Brun-ing, 379 U.S. 202, 85 S.Ct. 340, 13 L.Ed. 2d 339, on December 7, 1964, dismissed her appeal for want of jurisdiction. In view of the plethora of California statutes cited by Cross in her 1964 petition to the Supreme Court of California, and in her “Statement as to J…1 / 5