HALPERT ET AL.

v.

UDALL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR

Citator

Cited By

• Drakes BAY Land Co. v. The United States, 424 F.2d 574 (Ct. Cl. 1970)
  …t of Appeals, indeed, urged that jurisdiction be yielded because the Michigan courts had now embraced the District Court’s view of the Constitutional requirements. Defendant cites Halpert v. Udall, 231 F.Supp. 574 (S.D.Fla.1964), aff’d. per curiam, 379 U.S. 645, 85 S.Ct. 610, 13 L.Ed.2d 550 (1965), which , has superficial similarities to the case at bar which disappear on analysis. It involves the “hole in the doughnut” in Everglades National Park, 16 U.S.C. § 410, 410a. It is interesting to note that duri…
• Benenson v. The United States, 548 F.2d 939 (Ct. Cl. 1977)
  …ferred interminably, and dealt with at pleasure. * * * See also Foster v. City of Detroit, 254 F.Supp. 655 (E.D.Mich.1966), aff’d 405 F. 2d 138 (6th Cir. 1968); Halpert v. Udall, concurring opinion, 231 F.Supp. 574 (S.D.Fla.1964), aff’d per curiam, 379 U.S. 645, 85 S.Ct. 610, 13 L.Ed.2d 550 (1965); Van Alstyne, Taking or Damaging by Police Power: the Search for Inverse Condemnation Criteria, 44 So.Cal.L.Rev. 1 (1971). On the basis of the facts outlined above and the authorities cited, we conclude that the…
• Lucas v. People OF the State OF Mich., 420 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1970)
  …Court for certain seizures outside the curtilage of a dwelling. See People v. Blessing, 378 Mich. 51, 142 N.W. 2d 709 (1966), cert. denied 387 U.S. 914, 87 S.Ct. 1692, 18 L.Ed.2d 637; In re Winkle, 372 Mich. 292, 125 N.W. 2d 875 (1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 645, 85 S.Ct. 611, 13 L.Ed.2d 551, rehearing denied 380 U.S. 967, 85 S.Ct. 1102, 14 L.Ed.2d 157; People v. Harper, 365 Mich. 494, 113 N.W. 2d 808 (1962). “The Michigan Court of Appeals has in several cases held or implied that [*262] the exception is v…